.Net4.0用表達(dá)式樹構(gòu)建委托改善反射性能

最近搞一個(gè)系統(tǒng)時(shí)由于在比較關(guān)鍵地方用到反射了，所以要關(guān)注了一下反射的性能問題。

.Net4.0反射性能改善

看老趙的文章，老趙得到的結(jié)果是這樣的：

00:00:00.0125539 (Directly invoke)
00:00:04.5349626 (Reflection invoke)
00:00:00.0322555 (Dynamic executor)

而我把代碼搞下來自己運(yùn)行得到這樣的結(jié)果：

00:00:00.0009710 (Directly invoke)
00:00:00.4142893 (Reflection invoke)
00:00:00.0194501 (Dynamic executor)

這里不是說機(jī)器性能造成絕對的時(shí)間，而是差距比例完全不一樣，想了一陣想起了老趙當(dāng)時(shí)應(yīng)該是基于.Net3.5，果斷把程序的目標(biāo)框架切換到.Net3.5，結(jié)果如下：

00:00:00.0018801 (Directly invoke)
00:00:02.4288876 (Reflection invoke)
00:00:00.0141537 (Dynamic executor)

三者的差距仍然有些不一樣，老趙那邊的直接調(diào)用與動態(tài)執(zhí)行同一數(shù)量級的結(jié)果還是沒有。但發(fā)現(xiàn)了另一些信息。反射和直接調(diào)用方法.Net4.0比.Net3.5有非常大的改善，特別是反射，性能提升了好幾倍。反而構(gòu)建表達(dá)式樹動態(tài)調(diào)用的方式性能比.Net3.5差了一點(diǎn)。但是相對反射還是有差距，按照這個(gè)比例，寫寫表達(dá)式樹還是值得的。

改善老趙的DynamicMethodExecutor

老趙的那篇的文章的思路是使用DynamicMethodExecutor來構(gòu)造一個(gè)萬能的委托Func<object, object[], object>其中第一個(gè)參數(shù)是實(shí)例對象，第二是參數(shù)列表，第三是返回值。.Net4.0的表達(dá)式樹要比3.5的先進(jìn)一點(diǎn)，經(jīng)過一番改造發(fā)現(xiàn)是不需要這么一個(gè)萬能委托的，直接用Expression.Lambda.Compile()編譯出來的Delegate強(qiáng)制轉(zhuǎn)換為強(qiáng)類型的委托來得更加簡單。全部代碼一個(gè)方法即可，精簡了許多。

/// <summary>
/// 動態(tài)構(gòu)造委托
/// </summary>
/// <param name="methodinfo">方法元數(shù)據(jù)</param>
/// <returns>委托</returns>
public static Delegate BuildDynamicDelegate(MethodInfo methodInfo)
{
    if (methodInfo == null)
        throw new ArgumentNullException("methodInfo");

    var paramExpressions = methodInfo.GetParameters().Select((p, i) =>
    {
        var name = "param" + (i + 1).ToString(CultureInfo.InvariantCulture);
        return Expression.Parameter(p.ParameterType, name);
    }).ToList();

    MethodCallExpression callExpression;
    if (methodInfo.IsStatic)
    {
        //Call(params....)
        callExpression = Expression.Call(methodInfo, paramExpressions);
    }
    else
    {
        var instanceExpression = Expression.Parameter(methodInfo.ReflectedType, "instance");
        //insatnce.Call(params….)
        callExpression = Expression.Call(instanceExpression, methodInfo, paramExpressions);
        paramExpressions.Insert(0, instanceExpression);
    }
    var lambdaExpression = Expression.Lambda(callExpression, paramExpressions);
    return lambdaExpression.Compile();
}

使用時(shí)轉(zhuǎn)換為強(qiáng)類型的委托即可：

var action = (Action<TInstance, T1, T2>)BuildDynamicDelegate(methodInfo);
var func = (Func<TInstance, T1, T2, TReturn>)BuildDynamicDelegate(methodInfo);

老趙那個(gè)委托都是object，使用時(shí)的類型轉(zhuǎn)換，還有裝箱，拆箱都會有一定的性能損失，而強(qiáng)類型就沒有這個(gè)問題。

首先在老趙的那篇文章上一個(gè)方法改為兩個(gè)方法，然后測試：

public void Call1(object o1, object o2, object o3) { }
public void Call2(int o1, int o2, int o3) { }

private static void DynamicExecutor_ObjectType()
{
    var executor = new DynamicMethodExecutor(Call1MethodInfo);
    var watch1 = new Stopwatch();
    watch1.Start();
    for (var i = 0; i < Times; i++)
    {
        executor.Execute(ProgramInstance, ObjectParameters);
    }
    watch1.Stop();
    Console.WriteLine(watch1.Elapsed + " (Dynamic executor(object))(JeffreyZhao)");
}
private static void DynamicExecutor_IntType()
{
    var executor = new DynamicMethodExecutor(Call2MethodInfo);
    var watch1 = new Stopwatch();
    watch1.Start();
    for (var i = 0; i < Times; i++)
    {
        executor.Execute(ProgramInstance, IntParameters);
    }
    watch1.Stop();
    Console.WriteLine(watch1.Elapsed + " (Dynamic executor(int))(JeffreyZhao)");
}
private static void DynamicExecutor_StrongObject()
{
    var action = DynamicMethodBuilder.BuildAction<Program, object, object, object>(Call1MethodInfo);
    var watch1 = new Stopwatch();
    watch1.Start();
    for (var i = 0; i < Times; i++)
    {
        action(ProgramInstance, ObjectParameters[0], ObjectParameters[1], ObjectParameters[2]);
    }
    watch1.Stop();
    Console.WriteLine(watch1.Elapsed + " (Dynamic executor(object))(zhangweiwen)");
}

private static void DynamicExecutor_StrongInt()
{
    var action = DynamicMethodBuilder.BuildAction<Program, int, int, int>(Call2MethodInfo);
    var watch1 = new Stopwatch();
    watch1.Start();
    for (var i = 0; i < Times; i++)
    {
        action(ProgramInstance, IntParameters1[0], IntParameters1[1], IntParameters1[2]);
    }
    watch1.Stop();
    Console.WriteLine(watch1.Elapsed + " (Dynamic executor(int))(zhangweiwen)");
}

結(jié)果：

00:00:00.0188422 (Dynamic executor(object))(JeffreyZhao)
00:00:00.0210869 (Dynamic executor(int))(JeffreyZhao)
00:00:00.0142841 (Dynamic executor(object))(zhangweiwen)
00:00:00.0147589 (Dynamic executor(int))(zhangweiwen)

差距不大，但是還是有一定得改善，特別參數(shù)是int的方法，用了強(qiáng)類型后性能比較穩(wěn)定，不會出現(xiàn)偏差。

構(gòu)建委托動態(tài)賦值

既然有動態(tài)調(diào)用方法，同樣也可以動態(tài)賦值，而且據(jù)我的經(jīng)驗(yàn)，根據(jù)PropertyInfo的SetValue去反射設(shè)屬性值用得比反射調(diào)用方法更加頻繁。所以同樣需要有方法來動態(tài)構(gòu)建委托改善性能。

幸好，.Net4.0提供了支持，.Net4.0新增了Expression.Assign來表示一個(gè)賦值表達(dá)式。有了它，構(gòu)建起來比方法的更加簡單：

private static Action<TInstance, TProperty> BuildSetPropertyAction<TInstance, TProperty>(PropertyInfo propertyInfo)
{
    var instanceParam = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TInstance), "instance");
    var valueParam = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TProperty), "value");
    //instance.Property
    var propertyProperty = Expression.Property(instanceParam, propertyInfo);
    //instance.Property = value
    var assignExpression = Expression.Assign(propertyProperty, valueParam);
    var lambdaExpression = Expression.Lambda<Action<TInstance, TProperty>>(assignExpression, instanceParam, valueParam);
    return lambdaExpression.Compile();
}

直接返回了強(qiáng)類型的委托，所以使用起來更加簡單：

var action = BuildSetPropertyAction<Program, object>(ObjectPropertyInfo);
action(ProgramInstance, ObjectValue);

來測試一下性能：

private static void DirectlySetValueType()
{
    var watch1 = new Stopwatch();
    watch1.Start();
    for (var i = 0; i < Times; i++)
    {
        ProgramInstance.IntProperty = IntValue;
    }
    watch1.Stop();
    Console.WriteLine(watch1.Elapsed + " (Directly Set IntProperty)");
}

private static void ReflectionSetValueType()
{
    var watch2 = new Stopwatch();
    watch2.Start();
    for (var i = 0; i < Times; i++)
    {
        IntPropertyInfo.SetValue(ProgramInstance, IntValue, null);
    }
    watch2.Stop();
    Console.WriteLine(watch2.Elapsed + " (Reflection Set IntProperty)");
}

private static void DynamicSetValueType()
{
    var action = BuildSetPropertyAction<Program, int>(IntPropertyInfo);
    var watch1 = new Stopwatch();
    watch1.Start();
    for (var i = 0; i < Times; i++)
    {
        action(ProgramInstance, IntValue);
    }
    watch1.Stop();
    Console.WriteLine(watch1.Elapsed + " (Dynamic Set IntProperty)");
}

private static void DirectlySetReferenceType()
{
    var watch1 = new Stopwatch();
    watch1.Start();
    for (var i = 0; i < Times; i++)
    {
        ProgramInstance.ObjectProperty = ObjectValue;
    }
    watch1.Stop();
    Console.WriteLine(watch1.Elapsed + " (Directly Set ObjectProperty)");
}

private static void ReflectionSetReferenceType()
{
    var watch2 = new Stopwatch();
    watch2.Start();
    for (var i = 0; i < Times; i++)
    {
        ObjectPropertyInfo.SetValue(ProgramInstance, ObjectValue, null);
    }
    watch2.Stop();
    Console.WriteLine(watch2.Elapsed + " (Reflection Set ObjectProperty)");
}

private static void DynamicSetReferenceType()
{
    var action = BuildSetPropertyAction<Program, object>(ObjectPropertyInfo);
    //action(ProgramInstance, ObjectValue);
    var watch1 = new Stopwatch();
    watch1.Start();
    for (var i = 0; i < Times; i++)
    {
        action(ProgramInstance, ObjectValue);
    }
    watch1.Stop();
    Console.WriteLine(watch1.Elapsed + " (Dynamic Set ObjectProperty)");
}

結(jié)果如下：

Test Set Value：
00:00:00.0003237 (Directly Set IntProperty)
00:00:00.3160570 (Reflection Set IntProperty)
00:00:00.0132668 (Dynamic Set IntProperty)
-----
00:00:00.0028183 (Directly Set ObjectProperty)
00:00:00.2937783 (Reflection Set ObjectProperty)
00:00:00.0150118 (Dynamic Set ObjectProperty)

雖然跟直接賦值不能比，但比反射快大概30倍。

全部代碼,希望對大家有幫助.